JustujuAI, layer by layer.Open in the interactive map

Open vs closed weights

Some models' weights can be downloaded and run anywhere; others can only be reached through the provider's service.

Layer 5 · Foundation Models · Build and run time · reviewed 2026-10-30

Read first: Post-training: from predictor to assistant.

D1 · StoryFor young children and total beginners

Guess first: what can you do with a published recipe that a shop cake can't?

Some cake recipes are secret: you can only buy the cake at the shop. Others are published so anyone can bake the cake at home.

Closed AI models are like the shop cake. Open-weight models are like the published recipe.

Like: A secret recipe versus a published one.

D2 · PictureFor curious beginners

Closed models are used through an API or app. The provider controls updates, safety measures and how data is handled.

Open-weight models publish the trained weights. Anyone can download them, run them locally, fine-tune them or inspect them, under the terms of their licence, which ranges from permissive to restrictive.

Open weights aren't the same as open source: the training data and full training code are often not released.

Like: A secret recipe versus a published one.
Where it breaks: A published recipe lists every ingredient. Most open-weight models publish the finished weights but not the data or full process, so you can bake the cake but not recreate how the recipe was developed.

D5 · FrontierFor experts

D2 separates open and closed releases. The disputes are about how much extra risk open weights add, whether safeguards can survive, and what open should mean.

Marginal risk. A broad review found research insufficient to judge the extra risk open models add over existing technology (Kapoor et al., 2024); a US government report recommended monitoring rather than restricting for now (NTIA, 2024).

Safeguards that survive. Released safeguards can be fine-tuned away. One method resisted hundreds of fine-tuning steps, but durable protection is unsolved (Tamirisa et al., 2024).

What counts as open source. The main definition requires detailed information about training data, not the data itself, a compromise for data that cannot legally be shared (OSI, 2024).

How far behind. Open models have lagged the best closed models by about a year; if the gap narrows, closed providers must compete on something other than raw capability (Cottier et al., 2024).

Examples as of 2026-10-30

Sources

  1. The Open Source AI Definition 1.0 (Open Source Initiative) (2024)
  2. Dual-Use Foundation Models with Widely Available Model Weights Report (NTIA) (2024-07-30)
  3. On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models (Kapoor, Bommasani et al.) (2024-02-27)
  4. Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs (Tamirisa et al.) (2024-08-01)
  5. How far behind are open models? (Cottier et al., Epoch AI) (2024-11-04)

How it connects

More in Layer 5 · Foundation Models