Open vs closed weights
Some models' weights can be downloaded and run anywhere; others can only be reached through the provider's service.
Read first: Post-training: from predictor to assistant.
D1 · StoryFor young children and total beginners
Some cake recipes are secret: you can only buy the cake at the shop. Others are published so anyone can bake the cake at home.
Closed AI models are like the shop cake. Open-weight models are like the published recipe.
Like: A secret recipe versus a published one.
D2 · PictureFor curious beginners
Closed models are used through an API or app. The provider controls updates, safety measures and how data is handled.
Open-weight models publish the trained weights. Anyone can download them, run them locally, fine-tune them or inspect them, under the terms of their licence, which ranges from permissive to restrictive.
Open weights aren't the same as open source: the training data and full training code are often not released.
Like: A secret recipe versus a published one.
Where it breaks: A published recipe lists every ingredient. Most open-weight models publish the finished weights but not the data or full process, so you can bake the cake but not recreate how the recipe was developed.
D5 · FrontierFor experts
D2 separates open and closed releases. The disputes are about how much extra risk open weights add, whether safeguards can survive, and what open should mean.
Marginal risk. A broad review found research insufficient to judge the extra risk open models add over existing technology (Kapoor et al., 2024); a US government report recommended monitoring rather than restricting for now (NTIA, 2024).
Safeguards that survive. Released safeguards can be fine-tuned away. One method resisted hundreds of fine-tuning steps, but durable protection is unsolved (Tamirisa et al., 2024).
What counts as open source. The main definition requires detailed information about training data, not the data itself, a compromise for data that cannot legally be shared (OSI, 2024).
How far behind. Open models have lagged the best closed models by about a year; if the gap narrows, closed providers must compete on something other than raw capability (Cottier et al., 2024).
Examples as of 2026-10-30
- Open weights: Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral, Gemma, gpt-oss
- Closed weights: GPT, Claude, Gemini
- Fully open (weights, data and code): OLMo
Sources
- The Open Source AI Definition 1.0 (Open Source Initiative) (2024)
- Dual-Use Foundation Models with Widely Available Model Weights Report (NTIA) (2024-07-30)
- On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models (Kapoor, Bommasani et al.) (2024-02-27)
- Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs (Tamirisa et al.) (2024-08-01)
- How far behind are open models? (Cottier et al., Epoch AI) (2024-11-04)
How it connects
- Post-training: from predictor to assistant is released as Open vs closed weights.
- Open vs closed weights can be fine-tuned into Specialised and fine-tuned models.
- Local inference runtimes runs downloaded files of Open vs closed weights.
More in Layer 5 · Foundation Models
- Tokens & tokenization
Text is chopped into tokens (common words or pieces of words), and each token becomes a number the model can work with. - Transformers & attention
The architecture behind modern language models: stacked layers in which every token can look back at earlier tokens and pull in what's relevant. - How a model predicts the next token
A language model reads the text so far, gives every possible next token a probability, picks one, and repeats. - Pretraining
Training a model from scratch on huge amounts of text by asking it, over and over, to predict the next token and correcting its mistakes. - Post-training: from predictor to assistant
Fine-tuning and reinforcement learning that turn a raw text predictor into a helpful, safer assistant. - Reasoning models
Models trained to work through a problem step by step before answering, trading extra time and tokens at answer time (test-time compute) for better results on hard tasks. - Specialised and fine-tuned models
Models adapted for one job, such as coding or a small focused task, by fine-tuning, distillation or community modification of open weights.